Looking back over the years, it's the thriller that I perhaps hold highest and judge others off of and it was the film that put Denis Villeneuve in my "Must-See Directors" category. One of which he only continues to solidify and build his ranks within.
The original was not only an engrossing story, but a technical marvel. The cinematography from Roger Deakins was so perfect that I still have certain images burnt into my mind, the original score was brilliantly composed high-tension, drawn out notes, and the editing and pacing were similarly nearly perfect.
Sicario was a great film made perfect because it was crafted with so much skill.
When a sequel was first announced, I automatically assumed it was a direct-to-home cheap tie-in that wouldn't add much value. Seeing that Del Toro and Brolin were along for the ride helped to change that narrative a bit but the corny "sequel" name wasn't getting me to a spot where I could see it being in the same playing field as its Instant Classic predecessor. Furthering that concept was the fact that neither director Villeneuve, actress Emily Blunt, or cinematographer Roger Deakins were along for the ride; all obviously a huge loss from a talent perspective.
Sicario: Day of the Soldado isn't a direct-to-home sequel -- it's far better than that -- and it sets out to be a continuation in a broad-stroke sense. You could see this one with no knowledge of the first and be basically in the same spot as everyone in the theater, which is great, but it also doesn't ask my question: why does this sequel need to exist?
Perhaps I'm being unnecessarily protective over the 2015 original classic, but it never once seemed like a film that needed/warranted a sequel to me, much less one that's hardly tied to it. That makes it somewhat clear to me then that the addition of the "Sicario" in the title here is mainly to ride the goodwill and hype from the first film to drive this one's success. I suppose that's fine and with Brolin and Del Toro back, it doesn't feel like a complete betrayal, but the film, despite its quality, can't hold a candle to what came before it.
![]() |
"Why are you staring at my chin?" |
![]() |
The most efficient way to shoot a gun? |
Benicio Del Toro remains interesting as the U.S.-utilized assassin and continues to kick quite a bit of ass while Josh Brolin, continuing his insanely big year, is captivating as a knowledgeable, no-nonsense leader. Both interact well together and bring a lot of gravitas to the the film and it's certainly good to have them back. Surprisingly, I didn't miss Emily Blunt as much as I thought I would but it would have been intriguing to have her character fit in in some way. She was a bit of a "fish out of water" in the first film as her bad-ass character learned just how dirty you have to play with the Cartel, but I understand why she wasn't prominent here.
Along the way we're treated to some intense moments of action and suspense, all while a pulse-pounding original score, not dissimilar to the original's, plays overhead. Yeah, unfortunately here too the whole "first movie did it better" still exists, but there are a handful of moments that may have you on the edge of your seat. A particular convoy development was probably the highlight of the film for me and in a way reminded me of the superb "Border Crossing" scene in the original.
![]() |
"Are you looking at my chin too? What the hell?" |
CONS
- The eventual "save the girl" subplot felt like it wasn't where the best version of this movie would go. The film lost steam for me here
- Overlong by about 10 minutes. Lots of scenes where characters have elongated actions (i.e. staring or turning their head slowly) that could have been cut
- Doesn't quite capture the same intense magic of the original and in general is still an unnecessary sequel
- While it may not be a technical marvel, it's still a well made film. The editing is crisp, the cinematography has some stand-out moments, and the original score adds a lot to the intensity
- Captivating plot for most of the runtime
- Brolin and Del Toro are just as good here as they were in the original. Both are characters we want to see more of
- Intense, realistic action
- Unflinching in its brutality
- A better sequel than many of us expected
Rath's Review Score | 7.5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment