Granted, Pet Sematary has been made before, but there's no time like the present to craft a "high-quality" iteration of one of King's most famous tales, one that I never did get around to reading.
Unfortunately, to nearly the complete demise of the film, Pet Sematary is Hollywood's most recent casualty when it comes to blowing their load in the trailers for the film. The first trailer was innocent enough - creepy, ominous music, decent cast - I was semi-optimistic that it would be at least "good".
Eventually a second trailer emerged that was practically unavoidable for me given the amount I go to the movies and that this film was being teased before anything PG-13 and above. This second trailer, much like the god-awful give-everything-away-play-by-play that Batman v Superman had, literally tells Pet Sematary's entire story, including the twist/plot development of which I was unaware.
To say that having seen that trailer didn't affect my movie going experience for the worse would be an outright lie and its incredibly frustrating that a movie I otherwise would have enjoyed and found some shock-value in was almost completely neutered by a asinine marketing decision. Say what you will about how that affects my final score of the film and how fair that may be, but trailers are something that, when crafted with care, can make movies stand out and seem special. When they end up being a book report of the film, I'm just going to flat out stop seeing your movies.
![]() |
All these kids are trying to do is start a new DJ group in peace! |
![]() |
When they encounter Big Foot... |
The characters and casting are solid here with John Lithgow playing the gravelly-voiced neighbor and Jason Clarke as Louis, the father of the family. Clearly they can both act and while neither seems to be extending their range much here, they're impressive choices that elevate the material. Other members of the cast including Amy Seimetz (Rachel/mom) and Jete Laurence (Ellie/daughter) are just as strong.
![]() |
Tha's a mean kitty... |
Speaking of which...where was that trailer before this film? Seems like it would have been perfect placement and likely could have taught it a thing or two about creative, non-destructive trailers.
CONS
- The second trailer for the film was atrocious and book-report advertising. I'm going to try and avoid films that feature these trailers anymore because it's evident they dont' need/want my money if they're giving me everything 2 months early
- Feels uninspired and doesn't bring anything truly special to the table. Somewhat forgettable
- Not as scary as you're likely expecting
- Abrupt ending
- Solid cast that elevate the material
- Technically well made with decent pacing, editing, cinematography, and at times, original music
- Has a few jump scares that are effective
- Some creepy imagery from the subplots
- Fine plot had it not been ruined in the marketing
- Definitely R-rated, adds to intensity of some scenes
Rath's Review Score | 6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment