I have a deep repertoire of films I haven't seen -- though I seem to be making a dent in the classics as of late -- and The Godfather is another shining example of cinematic history that I've yet to observe.
In fact, I'm new to the entire franchise as I haven't seen either of the other two. My hope is to get through all three this year so that I can confidently cross this iconic trilogy off my list.
Sometimes when I do these Retro Reviews, I'm disappointed to find films that aren't quite what everyone has cracked them up to be. Time isn't kind to many films and in a lot of instances my general lack of timeliness to see a film can mean that I've already seen something newer (and better). There have been a few cases of this since I've started doing these several years ago, but there are also, pleasantly, times when the movie in question does impress me or blow me away.
Having now seen The Godfather, originally released in 1972, I truly believe this was a film ahead of its time. Many of my complaints for other films around this time period (choppy editing being the main culprit) were non existent here and both from a story, performance, and technological standpoint, this one is certainly a beacon of quality filmmaking.
I for one can't wait to see Parts II and III, even if they diminish in quality somewhat from what I've heard.
The best aspect about The Godfather, in my humble opinion, is its technological prowess for the time. That may come as a shock to some, but it's part of the reason the film still holds up incredibly well today. Editing is smooth and gives the feel of an epic. Shots and scenes are given plenty of time to breath and the flow from scene to the next is marvelous. There's also a lot of memorable and well-orchestrated cinematography and it's clear to see the influence that this film had on many others for decades following its release. Lastly, the sound design is great. It probably ages the most out of the other things discussed thus far mainly just because gun shots in 1970s films still sound like muted cars backfiring, but overall it excels in this respect too. Special note should be given to the Italian-heavy original score that's instantly iconic but also does well to set the mood and tone for the entire movie. All of this ages well and will continue to age well for decades to come because it structures a film that gives its characters and story room to breath all while adding a bit of character to the film itself.
![]() |
Never mess with an Italian man on the day of his daughter's wedding... |
![]() |
Hard to believe that's Al Pacino |
![]() |
One of the more memorable scenes in American cinematic history |
I really do struggle to find much wrong with this Italian-family, American crime epic. It's easy to see why the film is so important in the history of Hollywood and I was a bit blown away by just how impressively it holds up about 45 years later. It deserves to be as iconic as it has become and even if I find the other two slightly less impressive, this one will still rank high in the pantheon of films that I've seen.
CONS
- I'd hear the argument that it's too long
- Another argument that I'd listen to is that there are too many characters. They're hard to keep track of at times
- An absolute technical achievement, even over 4 decades later. The longevity of the film is owed a lot to the quality of filmmaking on display here
- Memorable cinematography
- Solid sound editing/design
- Superb editing
- Brando's Don Carleone is an instantly memorable character and probably one of the better "villain-heroes" to ever grace the screen
- Near equally as memorable cast of characters. Pacino's Micheal shines brightest alongside Brando
- Epic story that is intricate and well conceived. This is storytelling as one of its finest examples
- Several memorable scenes
- Post-viewing it seems like every character, scene, and moment is important in some manner, making the entire film a "must watch"
- A historic piece of film making that deserves the mantle it holds
Retro Rath's Review Score |
10/10 -- Instant Classic
Boy when you go retro, you don't mess around do ya, pardner? ;) Fantastic review.
ReplyDeleteHahaha definitely not. I got a lot of material to catch up on too so that helps :-) Thank you, sir!
DeleteWhat is currently on your watchlist? If you'd care to share! (I have a fat list of to-watch that continues to get larger and larger)
ReplyDeleteOh man. Too long to list really. Pretty much any type of classic from before 1990 I'd say. Immediately upcoming would probably be the rest of this trilogy, Predator, always wanted to check out Citizen Kane, and a bunch others!
DeleteInteresting (espeically seeing Predator on that list!). Care to list any recent movies (last ten-fifteen years or so) that are on your watchlist?!
DeleteHmmm...I'd really any "Award winning" film that I never got around to seeing. Or cult films that I didn't either. At some point would like to review all the Star Wars and finish reviewing the LotR too though even if I've already seen them.
DeleteWhat none-mainstream movies are on your radar, either past or present?!
DeleteNot sure I have too many off the top my head...would need to really go down my list. Any suggestions?
DeleteOh man I figured you kept a massive list or something. Up of the past few years, I'd suggest Nocturnal Animals, Land of Mine, The Lobster, Blue Ruin, Big Bad Wolves, Holy Motors, Let The Right One In. Those are just a few I can think of lol. Some are very decisive (ahem, Holy Motors).
DeleteGot a list-ish haha. Thanks for the rec's! I'll keep them in mind! :)
DeleteGo into Part III with an open mind. I've heard about it's reputation for years but ended up really liking it.
ReplyDeleteI'll try to remember to do that! You're not the first person to tell me that so it seems that it may be better than the reputation that it carries. Thanks!
Delete