Pages

Thursday, May 1, 2014

The Amazing Spider-Man 2

"Listen here, Django! I'm the boss around these
parts!"
Sometimes I just have no idea what movie the other critics have seen.

The Amazing Spider-Man franchise is really its own niche, particularly after this film, in the comic-book-to-movie-world. If you want deep, brooding, and more ground-in-reality superhero dramas, look towards DC. If you are looking for an epic, overarching story with tons of heroes, then we got Disney owned Marvel for that. But TASM2 really establishes its own brand as something ripped right from the pages of the comic book world. A real, living, breathing Peter Parker and Co. I have always kind of thought that Spider-man was Lee's favorite of his creations...the simple quirkiness of the teenage hero, the inventive powers, the uniqueness from any other superhero...it all makes for a stand out character that's not only awesome, but somewhat relatable too.

I won't retread ground here, but we all know the story of Spider-man on the silver screen. The most recent film, the first in this huge overarching plan that Sony has for Spider-man (including Venom and Sinister Six spin offs along with Spider-man sequels #3 and #4) was a proper reboot that really felt all too familiar. I generally liked it and you can read my original review HERE but it featured a stupid villain and that typical "getting your footing" feel that most new series have to find. Critics and fans did applaud it for its character chemistry though and I was also a fan of that. Personally for me, I thought it was a distant second behind Spider-Man 2 if I had ranked all four films.
Stretch those quads and groins everyone. Really feel the burn!
Dear Lord man! Use some freaking lotion!
I also won't retread ground with the abysmal Spider-Man 3. Which, to be completely honest, after reviews for TASM2 started coming in I thought that it would suffer the same fate as that film: too many villains. I can assure you that it most certainly does not. Does Jamie Foxx get enough spotlight as Electro? No, he doesn't. But at the same time, there is no villain overload. The Rhino (played by Paul Giamatti rather underused I must say) is in the film for a whopping 5 minutes tops. And Dane DeHaan's Green Goblin doesn't come in until near the end and I thought Electro and his teaming up was logical enough. So no, TASM2 isn't overstuffed with villains. And frankly I was impressed that it wasn't really overstuffed at all. They certainly allude to the future of the franchise, which apparently they have planned out better than DC at this point (seriously though...what on earth is Warner Brothers and DC Comics doing?!), but the movie stands on its own well. In this day and age of comic book movies its important for a film to serve the over arching mythos and plot as well as presenting and concluding one of its own. I wouldn't say that TASM2 does this as effortlessly or well as the most recent Captain America, but regardless it still does it well. I did take some big issue with Jamie Foxx's character's motives though. I thought they were incredibly stupid and to be honest...immature. It was like he was a small child until he actually turns into Electro. I also thought that Dane DeHaan's progression into the Green Goblin was super rushed and also lacked some sincere character motive.

And you know what? My complaints sincerely end there. For some, TASM2 might have too many tonal mood swings, and I would listen to that argument. One minute it's silly and the next it's breaking your heart. But in all honesty, that was the spirit of the comics. The Spider-Man in the comics has a ton of teen angst that makes for some funny situations, Peter Parker is a smart ass and has some funny quips, and there is genuine loss in his life on multiple occasions. I applaud TASM franchise for not copy catting off it's uber-successful cousins and being super dark or overly epic. That's what we have the other franchises for. When I go to see a Spider-man film, I want what I got in TASM2, and I didn't even know it. I want to laugh. I want to connect with the characters, who are still normal people during the day. I want to fly through New York City. I want to be thrilled. I want to be moved. I was all of those things with TASM2. And the main reason I felt that way was the webbed (pun intended) chemistry of the cast. Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone. Andrew Garfield and Sally Field. Andrew Garfield and Dane DeHaan. All of these interactions feel real and genuine, especially between Stone and Garfield, which helps you to connect to the characters that much more. Field feels like Peter Parker's aunt/mother. DeHaan feels like a long lost buddy of Parker. And, as cheesy as it may be, Stone feels like she is in love with Parker. It's by far the strongest aspect of the film and I think its what audiences will walk away with the most.
"Why so blue, Django?"
"Dude you have the weirdest location for a bald
spot..."
From a technical perspective, this Spider-Man is a real sight to be seen. It was pretty thrilling in IMAX 3D, and other than a few noticeable CG parts, most of it looks and sounds awesome. I was a little bummed that the first person web-slinging  from the first film was done away with this time, but we still get some tight, close-up shots of Peter swinging all over the city that will most likely induce vertigo/nausea for some (aka not me) and excitement for others (aka me). Electro is an incredible sight to be seen as well and overall he was very thought out (if a bit underutilized). The digitation of Jamie Foxx's voice is probably the coolest I've heard since Bane, and the dubstep original score that accompanies Electro's presence, while it sounds like it would a terrible, fratty idea, is actually freaking awesome. Much like the rest of the original score for that matter.

*Goes to Google who did the original score*

"Of course its Hans Zimmer!"

They should be college professors. Which class?
Chemistry 101
To say I was impressed with TASM2 would nearly be an understatement. Most of my hype this month is going towards Godzilla and Neighbors and lukewarm critic reviews really had me thinking that this would be the Iron Man 2 "set-up" film of this future beefy franchise. I went in with some really mediocre expectations and after a poorly filmed intro with far too much shaky cam I was leaning even more into the "meh" zone. But after some web swinging around New York City, some awfully cute interactions between Gwen and Peter, some great action scenes sprinkled with classic Spidey humor, an awesome looking/sounding villain, some time spent unravelling mysterious from the past, and a showdown with heart and a serious emotional punch, I was completely sold. Not only on the film by itself, but by The Amazing Spider-Man franchise as a whole.

I know I've said it many times before, but my readers come to me for MY opinion. And I'm not sure if TASM2 will float everyone's boat. There may not be enough heroes...the humor might be a little too obviously silly for some...maybe Spider-man just simply isn't your cup of tea. Who knows? But I'd like to think that I "got it". I get what director Marc Webb and the staff at Sony are going for and I'm all on board.

For me, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was one hell of a ride that, while not perfect, hit all the right notes.

It was (full pun intended) pretty amazing.

CONS:
  • Electro was underutilized. Not by a whole lot, but underutilized nonetheless
  • Electro's motives are the worst part of the movie and the biggest blemish on what is otherwise a stellar superhero film. He basically goes from adoring Spider-man to wanting to kill him in about 0.5 seconds
  • The progression of Harry Osborne into depressed Harry Osborne into Green Goblin was rushed
  • A rather unexciting opening sequence with terrible shaky cam
  • No end credits scene? WTF Marvel?
  • They could have streamlined Peter solving his dad's mysteries a bit to cut down the run time
PROS:
  • Fantastic chemistry in nearly every relationship of the cast. Garfield and Stone have something delightful for sure and every character feels so natural around the others
  • Garfield makes a better Spider-man and Peter Parker than Maguire ever did
  • The rest of the cast is strong, particularly Fields. Foxx is a *nearly* iconic villain and I just could not shake the feeling of how much DeHaan reminded me of a young DiCaprio. Super weird
  • Awesome, inventive action with some superb slow mo, 3D, and special effects
  • Electro is awesome both visually and audibly. The dubstep original score was risky, but it worked awesome
  • Speaking of the original score, add another one to your notch of awesomeness Hans!
  • Impressively packed full without ever feeling over stuffed. It sets up the future films while being a very complete one in its own right
  • Oh the feels at the end!
  • Captures the spirit of the comics probably better than most other comic book adaptations. While this may turn some people off, I really applaud their decision to differentiate themselves from the main Marvel and DC pack


Rath's Review Score: 9/10
 
 
 


10 comments:

  1. Awesome! I am glad you liked the movie. I have seen some negative reviews, but since you liked the movie, I have no doubt that I will as well.. I can't wait to see TASM2!

    -James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you'll really like it. I was really impressed with it after going in with meddling expectations.

      Some awesome action with lots of silly, funny parts and heart to go along with it!

      Delete
  2. I am on the fence w/ASM2. Visually it had some wonderful moments. Garfield & Stone worked well together. HOWEVER, it was far too long, there really was no story, characters rush in and out w/o much motivation, and as much as I tried I could not get into the film. I don't think it was terrible, but for me, it was a wasted opportunity. And BTW, after two films, I still prefer Maguire...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair enough. It seems to really be dividing movie goers this last weekend. I thought the run time skirted by rather quickly and with regards to the story it helped to set up the rest of the extended universe.

      I can see how, if you couldn't get into it, it would have been rather lackluster.

      I thought Maguire was great in the role, but with relation the spirit of the comics I think that Garfield does a better job.

      I guess this movie just wasn't for everyone it seems!

      Delete
  3. Do you never watch "Non-New Releases" ? I've seen your Retro Reviews but they are completely Lacking. Just Curious as to why that is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find that with a full-time job, working out 4-6 times a week, writing a novel, a social life, and getting to at least one new release every week for this site that I have less and less time to go back and watch/review films that I haven't seen.

      It has been a while since I've done a Retro Review, I plan on making up for that once summer rolls around and maybe doing one every couple of weeks.

      Any suggestions on ones you would like to see reviewed?

      Delete
    2. That is pretty busy schedule I feel ya. Obviously the main point of this site is to review New releases but I think reading reviews of slightly older films would be a bit more interesting (for me atleast).

      Well i'm a pretty big movie buff myself (especially the Horror genre) but I think it would be interesting to see what you think of Some Korean Thrillers (Oldboy 2003, I Saw The Devil, The Chaser, The Man From No Where, A Bittersweet Life, Mother--most of these are on Netflixs) or Horror (Martyrs, The Orphanage, Frailty, Inside, Scream, Drag Me To Hell). Or My Top 6 films of All Time (Jaws, The Thing 1982, Drive, Memories of Murder, Snatch, and of course Oldboy 2003). The South Korean films though are almost always amazing in my eyes. A lot darker than Hollywood, which is probably why I like it/ something different. Plus I dont mind Subtitles.

      Very interested in seeing what you think of the Original 'Oldboy'. Because Spike Lees film was complete GARBAGE. It was terrible compared to the original. Im still upset over the fact it was remade. Everything was so rushed in that film. I could rant forever about that movie.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for the suggestions!

      I'm not a big horror buff, but I could always go back and try a few out.

      I should definitely review Drive though. Dear Lord do I love that movie. I think I'm just still so upset with Only God Forgives and how atrocious it was.

      While I haven't seen the original Oldboy, I do agree that the new one was lacking. I hardly remember anything about it so that should tell you something.

      Once again, thanks for the suggestions! I'll try to get some older movies watched/reviewed in the coming months!

      Delete
  4. You nailed it with the review! The complete tonal shift is what the comics are like. Spider-Man jokes a lot, and then really bad stuff happens to him, and he has to deal with that.
    *Spoilers*
    The contrasting tone is intentional, because it makes what happens towards the end even more powerful.
    I also agree with you about how effectively the movie sets itself apart from the other comic book movie franchises by capturing the comics perfectly.
    The only thing that I dislike agree about is Electro because I found his mental instability effective, granted, I do tend to like the nerdy social outcast character type more than most.

    Also, what the heck were the other critics watching?! Aside from a couple of somewhat rushed plot points, what more could you ask for? *MAJOR SPOILERS* Gwen's scene towards the end is probably the saddest thing I have seen in a comic book movie in a long time, maybe ever, even if I knew it was coming.

    One big thing that Sony needs to fix for the movie: STOP spoiling everything in the trailers! Fortunately, I avoided all of the trailers, so it was not a huge problem for me, but a ton of people were complaining about it, and I think that is one of the reasons for the lower score for some viewers.

    -James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm pretty confident that there might be two versions of the film out there just because of how divided the fan base and critics are.

      I am totally in agreement with you. The tone and humor are almost EXACTLY like the comics and it's like critics and fans are bashing it for that reason...which kind of indicates to me that they may not have been fans in the first place. I was discussing it with one guy and he even said that TASM2 was "campy" and "made Spider-man 3 look good". Wait, what sir?

      I agree the trailers revealed a little too much. But even still the scene at the end was so beautifully tragic that it still got me.

      Glad you liked it James!

      Delete